Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpqBKrtl/PALINDROME_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISPAL(P)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
__¹(X1, active(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
ISNELIST(active(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
MARK(i) → ACTIVE(i)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V1)
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
ACTIVE(isQid(u)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(mark(X1), mark(X2))
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isQid(o)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(a) → ACTIVE(a)
ISQID(active(X)) → ISQID(X)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISQID(I)
ISPAL(active(X)) → ISPAL(X)
ISQID(mark(X)) → ISQID(X)
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ISLIST(mark(X)) → ISLIST(X)
__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(o) → ACTIVE(o)
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → ISQID(V)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
MARK(isQid(X)) → ACTIVE(isQid(X))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isList(V2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
ACTIVE(isPal(nil)) → MARK(tt)
ACTIVE(isQid(a)) → MARK(tt)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(u) → ACTIVE(u)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
ACTIVE(isQid(i)) → MARK(tt)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
ACTIVE(isQid(e)) → MARK(tt)
ISPAL(mark(X)) → ISPAL(X)
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → ISNELIST(V)
ISNELIST(mark(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
__¹(active(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(e) → ACTIVE(e)
MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
ISNEPAL(active(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → ISQID(V)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → ISNEPAL(V)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(Y, Z)
ACTIVE(isList(nil)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → MARK(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → AND(isQid(I), isPal(P))
ISLIST(active(X)) → ISLIST(X)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISPAL(P)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
__¹(X1, active(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
ISNELIST(active(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
MARK(i) → ACTIVE(i)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V1)
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
ACTIVE(isQid(u)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → __¹(mark(X1), mark(X2))
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isQid(o)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(a) → ACTIVE(a)
ISQID(active(X)) → ISQID(X)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → ISQID(I)
ISPAL(active(X)) → ISPAL(X)
ISQID(mark(X)) → ISQID(X)
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ISLIST(mark(X)) → ISLIST(X)
__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(o) → ACTIVE(o)
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → ISQID(V)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
MARK(isQid(X)) → ACTIVE(isQid(X))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → AND(isList(V1), isList(V2))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISNELIST(V2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
ACTIVE(isPal(nil)) → MARK(tt)
ACTIVE(isQid(a)) → MARK(tt)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(u) → ACTIVE(u)
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V2)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
ACTIVE(isQid(i)) → MARK(tt)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
ACTIVE(isQid(e)) → MARK(tt)
ISPAL(mark(X)) → ISPAL(X)
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → ISNELIST(V)
ISNELIST(mark(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
__¹(active(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(e) → ACTIVE(e)
MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
ISNEPAL(active(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → ISQID(V)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → ISNEPAL(V)
AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → __¹(Y, Z)
ACTIVE(isList(nil)) → MARK(tt)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → MARK(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → ISLIST(V1)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → AND(isQid(I), isPal(P))
ISLIST(active(X)) → ISLIST(X)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 8 SCCs with 34 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISPAL(mark(X)) → ISPAL(X)
ISPAL(active(X)) → ISPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISPAL(mark(X)) → ISPAL(X)
ISPAL(active(X)) → ISPAL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(ISPAL(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
ISNEPAL(active(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNEPAL(mark(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)
ISNEPAL(active(X)) → ISNEPAL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(ISNEPAL(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISQID(active(X)) → ISQID(X)
ISQID(mark(X)) → ISQID(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISQID(active(X)) → ISQID(X)
ISQID(mark(X)) → ISQID(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(ISQID(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNELIST(active(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
ISNELIST(mark(X)) → ISNELIST(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNELIST(active(X)) → ISNELIST(X)
ISNELIST(mark(X)) → ISNELIST(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(mark(X)) → ISLIST(X)
ISLIST(active(X)) → ISLIST(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISLIST(mark(X)) → ISLIST(X)
ISLIST(active(X)) → ISLIST(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

AND(mark(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(active(X1), X2) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, mark(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(X1, active(X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 3 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(X1, active(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(active(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(X1, active(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(active(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(X1, mark(X2)) → __¹(X1, X2)
__¹(mark(X1), X2) → __¹(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(__¹(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_1 + x_2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 3 + (4)x_1

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ PisEmptyProof

          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
MARK(isQid(X)) → ACTIVE(isQid(X))
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → MARK(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(isQid(X)) → ACTIVE(isQid(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → MARK(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 0
POL(a) = 7/4
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(isList(x₁)) = 2
POL(e) = 4
POL(mark(x₁)) = (3/2)x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 2
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(o) = 15/4
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 1/2
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = 5/2 + (4)x_1
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 2
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 4
POL(tt) = 0
POL(u) = 0
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 2
POL(nil) = 4

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → MARK(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
ACTIVE(__(X, nil)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(nil, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(isList(__(V1, V2))) → MARK(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → MARK(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
ACTIVE(and(tt, X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → MARK(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 9/4
POL(a) = 2
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + (4)x_1 + x_2
POL(isList(x₁)) = x_1
POL(e) = 9/4
POL(mark(x₁)) = x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1/2 + x_1 + x_2
POL(o) = 1
POL(isQid(x₁)) = x_1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 3/2 + x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = x_1
POL(isPal(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 3/2 + x_1
POL(tt) = 1/2
POL(u) = 4
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = x_1
POL(nil) = 2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(a) → active(a)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(isPal(X)) → ACTIVE(isPal(X))
MARK(isList(X)) → ACTIVE(isList(X))
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(and(mark(X1), X2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 0
POL(a) = 0
POL(isList(x₁)) = 1 + (1/4)x_1
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1/4 + (2)x_2
POL(e) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 2 + (2)x_1
POL(o) = 0
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 2
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 1/2 + (1/4)x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = 3 + (4)x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + (4)x_1
POL(tt) = 0
POL(u) = 5/4
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 1/4
POL(nil) = 0

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(isNeList(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))
ACTIVE(isPal(V)) → MARK(isNePal(V))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 2
POL(a) = 13/4
POL(isList(x₁)) = 4 + (3/2)x_1
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(e) = 5/4
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1/2 + x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 0
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 4
POL(o) = 7/2
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 1 + (2)x_1
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = 5/2
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 1 + (2)x_1
POL(tt) = 15/4
POL(u) = 5/2
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 4
POL(nil) = 2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(isList(V)) → MARK(isNeList(V))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 1
POL(a) = 5/4
POL(isList(x₁)) = 4
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(e) = 13/4
POL(mark(x₁)) = 1/2 + (4)x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 0
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 7/2 + (9/4)x_1
POL(o) = 5/4
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 5/4 + (7/2)x_1
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = (2)x_1
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 3/2 + (4)x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = 3
POL(MARK(x₁)) = 0
POL(tt) = 5/4
POL(u) = 4
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 0
POL(nil) = 3/4

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(isNeList(X)) → ACTIVE(isNeList(X))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 5/2
POL(a) = 2
POL(isList(x₁)) = 4 + (7/2)x_1
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = (4)x_2
POL(e) = 7/2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = (7/2)x_1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 7/2 + (13/4)x_1 + (4)x_2
POL(o) = 3/2
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 3/2 + (7/2)x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = 4
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(tt) = 7/4
POL(u) = 1/4
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 4 + (4)x_1
POL(nil) = 11/4

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(i) = 5/4
POL(a) = 7/2
POL(isList(x₁)) = 7/2 + (2)x_1
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 2
POL(e) = 7/2
POL(mark(x₁)) = 4
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 5/4 + (3/2)x_1 + (1/2)x_2
POL(o) = 5/4
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 0
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 5/4 + (3)x_1
POL(active(x₁)) = 3/2
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(tt) = 9/4
POL(u) = 13/4
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 13/4 + (11/4)x_1
POL(nil) = 7/2

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(isNePal(X)) → ACTIVE(isNePal(X))
ACTIVE(isNePal(V)) → MARK(isQid(V))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(MARK(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(mark(x₁)) = (4)x_1
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 4 + (3)x_1
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(ACTIVE(x₁)) = 3

The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

        ↳ AND

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

          ↳ QDP

            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                          ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(__(__(X, Y), Z)) → mark(__(X, __(Y, Z)))
active(__(X, nil)) → mark(X)
active(__(nil, X)) → mark(X)
active(and(tt, X)) → mark(X)
active(isList(V)) → mark(isNeList(V))
active(isList(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNeList(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isList(V1), isNeList(V2)))
active(isNeList(__(V1, V2))) → mark(and(isNeList(V1), isList(V2)))
active(isNePal(V)) → mark(isQid(V))
active(isNePal(__(I, __(P, I)))) → mark(and(isQid(I), isPal(P)))
active(isPal(V)) → mark(isNePal(V))
active(isPal(nil)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(a)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(e)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(i)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(o)) → mark(tt)
active(isQid(u)) → mark(tt)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → active(__(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → active(and(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(isList(X)) → active(isList(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → active(isNeList(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → active(isQid(X))
mark(isNePal(X)) → active(isNePal(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → active(isPal(X))
mark(a) → active(a)
mark(e) → active(e)
mark(i) → active(i)
mark(o) → active(o)
mark(u) → active(u)
__(mark(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, mark(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
__(active(X1), X2) → __(X1, X2)
__(X1, active(X2)) → __(X1, X2)
and(mark(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, mark(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
and(active(X1), X2) → and(X1, X2)
and(X1, active(X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isList(mark(X)) → isList(X)
isList(active(X)) → isList(X)
isNeList(mark(X)) → isNeList(X)
isNeList(active(X)) → isNeList(X)
isQid(mark(X)) → isQid(X)
isQid(active(X)) → isQid(X)
isNePal(mark(X)) → isNePal(X)
isNePal(active(X)) → isNePal(X)
isPal(mark(X)) → isPal(X)
isPal(active(X)) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.